Posted by John on 9/22/2006, 10:54 pm, in reply to "Re: OUR WATERWAYS!!" He said he thought there was enough water in the south ends docks, when about half the water space has been filled in. There was no reasoning or common sense with the man. He would say he wants to keep water spaces then vehemently defend obliterating water spaces. Enough is enough. He is a waste of time. The systematic way he was repeating the same points it was clear he has an agenda - financial I would assume.
--Previous Message--
: Phillip,
:
: I don't think John's views are extreme at
: all as I agree with them and the case
: presented is very strong. The pictures say
: most. You will find most people in Liverpool
: and on the Wirral agree with him. I have
: pointed a few people to this web site and
: not one has taken your view at all, with
: nearly all saying it was about time someone
: stood up and shouted. I hope all the
: councillors and planners read this web site
: to bring them down to earth from the
: developers glossy schmaltz. Keeping the dock
: waters and digging out filled in docks is
: something I am all for in the redundant
: docks. I don't want to debate point for
: point with you as you tend to go on and
: around in circles and became very trite.
: Your exchanges with John at first were
: interesting and entertaining then they
: became trite. My knowledge of the history of
: the docks is not strong enough for me to
: enter into such a debate, and I don't have
: the time to enter into long debates as I
: would have to go away and start reading
: thick history books to reply. I appreciate
: the historical information you and John have
: posted to back your views. You are strongly
: giving the opposite view which is OK and so
: far have not swayed me. Whether you are
: playing devils advocate I'm not sure. I want
: to close saying from a non-emotional view,
: that I agree with the aims of the web site.
Mark I removed Philips posts as he was clearly a troll or a plant from an organisation who makes money from filling in water spaces. His last few post were clearly the same stuck record, repeating the same shallow points which have been addressed about three times. He has no vision of idea of where the water space should be in a number of years time - he may have had however that may not have been his brief.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread