Posted by HISC on 2/20/2012, 12:53 pm, in reply to "Re: Natalie Portman vs Hayden Panettiere title bout"
Who abandoned whom?
And who got light-years better when they left what certainly appears to be incompetent leadership?
And how is the competition stiffer in Tech than the Consortium when three other flyweights in HISC are in the Top 5?
And how can Virginie deserve a shot after getting defeated on her home turf while Natalie mugged Hayden?
And how can we take the challenge of someone in the 40s in the rankings seriously? Sorry. Someone who was in the 40s before losing?
All excellent questions, but here are the best of all.
Virginie? Are you kidding?
We have someone in house far more qualified in Mila Kunis, a Top 5 talent who's EARNED a shot. However, it is difficult to continue to run roughshod when you are shodding rough over your own stablemates.
We have heard a couple voices, brats in need of stomping, that do intrigue us and who would give Natalie a little breather.
And we have a 'Jump to the head of the class' idea we're mulling that may be controversial.
All will be revealed in due time.
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
« Back to index