[ Post a Response | The MusicWeb Message Board ]
CELEBRATING 20,000 Classical CD reviews on-line; 21,000 visitors each day.
Return to MusicWeb International
Posted by Alistair Hinton on February 23, 2007, 9:55 pm, in reply to "Re: Hatto? Ha!" I appalud you once more for revealing this additional material. Bst, Alistair
88.106.247.27
I think that, whether or not the correspondence between WB-C/JH and you (and likewise any others) was concocted by just one person (whoever that may be) or more than one person (whomsoever they may have been), it has all now to be considered in the light of what we now know in that the likelihood that most if not all of those 119 CDs are fake is strongly suggestive of the likelihood that the correspondence is likewise and that it would indeed have had to be so otherwise the deception might have revealed itself sooner. Whoever wrote that correspondence clearly had a vital responsibility consistently to maintain an image, presence of mind and (hopeful) credibility that would have accorded with what was being put out on CD and the alleged background thereto, on the basis that those recordings really were all supposed to be JH's work - otherwise the rat-smelling might have started earlier than it did.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread
Thank you for using the MusicWeb Message Board.
Len Mullenger - Founder of MusicWeb