This makes the provision of dates by record companies doubly important, since it really does help to know exactly when in the composer's career a particular work was written. I would not however describe as 'lazy' any record company which failed to provide such information for works that remain in manuscript, when it is often next to impossible to say exactly when the composer 'signed off' on a particular score (if indeed they ever did). I note, for example, that when I reviewed a disc from EM Records last year I was totally unable to ascertain any date for the Bantock arrangements of Farnaby that were included on the disc. However I would nevertheless suggest that the writers of booklet notes (who have after all a little more time on their hands for research) should at least try to give some indication of date where this can be ascertained with any degree of certainty. On the other hand, in days when record companies (not, I hasten to add, EM Records) so often fail to provide the most basic information such as texts and translations, or sometimes indeed notes at all, I am probably hoping for the moon.
« Back to index | View thread »
Thank you for taking part in the MusicWeb International Forum.
Len Mullenger - Founder of MusicWeb