[ Post a Response | Puzzles Forum ]

Solution...

Posted by markr on 8/8/2009, 8:04 am, in reply to "A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers"

1: 2 3 4 5 2: 1 6 7 8 3: 9 1 11 10 4: 14 12 1 13 5: 12 13 14 1 6: 11 2 10 14 7: 13 11 9 2 8: 10 9 2 12 9: 8 14 3 7 10: 6 8 13 3 11: 3 7 12 6 12: 5 4 8 11 13: 7 10 5 4 14: 4 5 6 9

---

Message Thread: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - Tournament 6/8/2009, 5:18 pm Solution With Open Source Software - Moby Dick 11/8/2009, 5:51 pm 14 solution with time slot constraint - markr 8/8/2009, 10:35 pm CORRECT - Tournament 9/8/2009, 1:07 am 15+ status - markr 9/8/2009, 1:26 am Re: 15+ status - Moby Dick 11/8/2009, 9:08 am UPDATE - markr 10/8/2009, 7:25 am Re: UPDATE - Tournament 10/8/2009, 4:17 pm Solution... - markr 8/8/2009, 8:04 am Re: Solution... [Incorrect] - Tournament 8/8/2009, 7:37 pm oops - markr 8/8/2009, 9:57 pm and 15... - markr 8/8/2009, 8:16 am 16 and 17 :( - markr 8/8/2009, 8:28 am ELO - markr 8/8/2009, 5:54 am Re: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - markr 7/8/2009, 9:05 pm Re: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 10:11 pm Re: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - Tournament 8/8/2009, 12:51 am Correction on my post - Tournament 8/8/2009, 6:23 am Re: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 9:54 pm Re: A Major Challenge for True Puzzlers - markr 8/8/2009, 5:00 am Might Not Be Possible? - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 8:15 pm Re: Might Not Be Possible? - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 9:44 pm Re: Might Not Be Possible? - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 10:36 pm Clarification Request - Moby Dick 7/8/2009, 9:08 am Re: Clarification Request - Tournament 7/8/2009, 4:06 pm Question - Denis Borris 7/8/2009, 6:36 pm Re: Question - Tournament 7/8/2009, 8:06 pm Update - Tournament 7/8/2009, 8:10 pm Fairer Method - NickMcG 8/8/2009, 12:42 am Even Fairer Method? - markr 8/8/2009, 4:55 am Re: Even Fairer Method? - NickMcG 8/8/2009, 5:18 am Re: Even Fairer Method? - markr 8/8/2009, 5:49 am « Back to thread

---

Post a Response