
Posted by Robbin on 4/27/2006, 6:35 am, in reply to "gender, angels and why?" This has not been the point of my discussion. Just the entire "marriage, not marrying" equals lack of gender issue has been a vehicle for my point. My point has been that an entire doctrine has been made out of a few words that do not have any bearing on what many claim they do. My point has been that if this were a doctrine they didn't agree with they would claim the hermeneutic stance that you can not make a doctrine out of what is NOT said. Mine has been an argument about hermeneutics, gender and angels just happen to be the vehicle. So in that sense, this has been a valuable discussion in that it shows that one will believe a "doctrine" for whatever reason, regardless of how it fits hermeneutically. Robbin
24.17.174.130
Many here may see my entire discussion as proporting that there will be gender in heaven.
Message Thread
![]()
« Back to index