Posted by Randall
on 1/13/2009, 16:59:52
Well I was surprised I didn't see a discussion on here since the HOF ballots were counted. Not surprising that Mark didn't get in again. Kind of surprised the total went down a bit.But really surprised to hear guys at the MLB network say they would vote for Bonds when he comes up! I really don't get that at all. The one guy said because he felt Bonds had a HOF career before he was tainted. Thats kind of splitting hairs isn't it? One commentor said he voted for McGwire because there is no proof of any wrongdoing and it's not his job to be judge and jury in that respect. I thought that sounded like a fair answer. What have you guys to say? personally I feel that it was a level playing field because I feel the percentage of people that tried steroids EVEN ONCE is far more than we realize. My guess would be 75%. But we will never know.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread