Re: Laws mean absolutely nothing ...
Posted by Kahdoosch on October 22, 2006, 5:07 pm, in reply to "Laws mean absolutely nothing ..."|
Obviously, if it had no chance of getting through committee then there must be a different agenda in wasting committee time on it. Alternatively, it might not be considered such a legless proposal, in some quarters, that others would have us believe. Opinions as fact and all that.
|
|
Message Thread:
- Whoa! - CaroleK October 21, 2006, 6:16 pm
- He's got a point carol - Clinton October 24, 2006, 3:44 pm
- And I will keep on posting them up ... - CaroleK October 23, 2006, 11:49 am
- Re: LOL - etlk February 28, 2007, 7:02 pm
- Re: LOL - Ivix October 24, 2006, 8:49 pm
- Re: LOL - Visigoth October 24, 2006, 1:26 pm
- Re: LOL - Visigoth October 24, 2006, 1:44 pm
- Re: LOL - Visigoth October 24, 2006, 2:20 pm
- Laws mean absolutely nothing ... - CaroleK October 22, 2006, 12:09 pm
- Re: Laws mean absolutely nothing ... - Kahdoosch October 22, 2006, 5:07 pm
- Re: I'm not on any "side" - CaroleK March 19, 2007, 4:46 pm
- Actually, Marco - Kahdoosch October 22, 2006, 5:14 pm
- Denari - Kahdsooch October 22, 2006, 5:22 pm
- A question? - Kahdoosch October 22, 2006, 10:08 am
- So ... - CaroleK October 23, 2006, 11:57 am
 « Back to thread
|