[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]
Posted by Calgacus on October 24, 2006, 5:31 pm, in reply to "Re: I think rather, you have understood me far better than you want us to make believing. - nt - " But one should be able to understand my bad English with some effort, if one dedicates a little , so to speak, "poetic-lyric" imagination to my clumsy phrases. Anyhow I do not lose the - hopefully quite baseless - suspicion, that some people of this forum have still big problems with the "multi-cultural" society, of which it is the speach everywhere in the globalization debate. I personally had never had unsurmountable problems to understand outlandish people, who used very bad German in German discussion forums, particularly because it is presumably very much more difficult to express correctly his thaughts in German as in English. For it is extra difficult to wright correctly and understandable in German (German is a extremely difficult langugage! I can absolutely understand, when one does not love to learn German, for it is very difficult to learn). My theory is anyway that the thing with the multi-culti society is a pure propagandistic euphemisme, which means an other thing in reality, namely the one culture society on the basis of the anglo-saxon civilisation, in fact exclusively! Against that it would be to say nothing, unless some people would missunderstand this - for the Anglo-Saxons privileged -situation as a licence to do not take care at all in certain communication situations. Some people seem to have a frightening lack of imagination capability or possibly even a lack of good will for a good communication at all. I saw through the drivel of "multi-culti" as propagandistic chatter of globalization usufructuaries, who in fact talk permanently about high ideals of better interpersonal communications between the nations, but in reality mean a quite other thing, namely the more or less usurping unification of the world under one only culture and language. The "Round Table" of Cecil Rhodes lets salute! So easy I do not want to make it the English native speakers. A good interpersonal understanding always needs at least 2 parties, who want to communicate with each other. Where the basic good will lacks, there cannot be communication at all. The communication distances must be bridgeovered by imagination, whereby else? This "transfer"-achievement does not mean, that one understands always all complete, but there are always ambiguities. That however makes the communications more interesting. Such difficult communications are less sterile than absolutely perfect communications. Furthermore one can enhance his own mental-intellectual horizon by the necessity to surmount barriers of understanding, enhancing the own imagination dimensions. The insistence with the own perception conventions and consuetudes is anywhere nothing other as a form of cultural Narcissm or rather autism, where all things circles endless around the own Self, always and once again until in all eternity. A good communication is first a thing of the good will, not a thing of the perfectness or correctness. I also do not completely understand all texts of the participants. When this would play a role, I would not need at all to communicate with someone, whether here nor else. Communication begins also there, where one does not understand all, but where understanding is necessary. If I see it right, then there are also bigger understanding difficulties between the English native speakers on this forum, in fact not too few. Despite the common language. I prophezize that these understanding problems between some English native speaker participants will yet accumulate quite massively all the more accumulate the tendencies of the world-unit- empire; sure enough by the propagandistic waffle, that all is about pure amelioration of the interhuman relations between nations and the intercultural high-minded intercommunion between the cultures. In reality it is only about economical and poltical power interests, nothing else. But these power interests may not look so ugly like they look in reality. The whole thing should get a beautiful dress. The entire speechs about the "multi-culti" thing and the "globo" affair wants to say, that "multi-culti" and "globo" helps by no means the amelioration of peace, freedom and democracy, but in contrary causes even bigger troubles between the nations as without this propaganda chatter, which awakes only false expectances, which always are frustated sooner or later. So much is certain that the world public will rub disagreeably its eyes, when the naked verity about the "world fraternisation" of the "multi-culti-globo" chatter has shown its true charcter. It is no big hyperbole, that this "verity" will have or already has the form of an democratorship of high-finance´mercies, no hint of an nations fraternisation or cultural exchange. On contrary. The animosities between the nations and cultures will accept an huge extents: Keyword: divide et impera! When 2 people are at strive, the third is pleased. I am astonished, that such evil things are happened like 911. I am rather astonished about it, that it is not happened yet much more and much more worse. The conflict potential for even more huge assassinations is existent long ago. A clash of civilisations is planned in reality, not a fraternisation of the civilisations. This clash is the necessary measure for the aim of an world unification under 1 culture (not under many cultures alias "multi-culti", as propagandisticly is affirmed). That these things are so or alike, as I affirm, one sees it well in this forum, very well even! Calgacus PS: I beg to excuse my clumsy and mistakable English.
... My English knowledge is sure enough worse than "crap", so to speak "mega-hyper-super-crap", in order to formulate restrainingly it. I know it!
When I read a difficult poem in the German language, I cannot understand all at first go, because many figures of speech diverge from normal application of the words. therefore I must be able to transfer (so to speak "translate") the unusual application of the words by my imagination.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread