
Posted by Kat Hak Sung on May 31, 2008, 7:32 pm
548. Alex Jones, a kook or a hook (5/22)
On 5/19, in the afternoon, I read a news about Alex Jones which said Alex is a shill. I agree so. In this country, any opinion against the government used to be suppressed. Martin Luther King is a good example. (Even he is "politically correct" in the name) For those dissenters who can stand long time without problem, there used to be a purpose. I wrote a comment on that thread. Before I could finish it I encountered a problem to type a reply. I had to re-write it in the word-pad and cut and stick it to reply. Then I was blocked from internet the rest of that day. The blockade continued several hours the next day.
The event made me believe my point of view was correct. Here it is:
The news. Quote, "Alex Jones
An honest investigator of crimes?
Or a criminal trying to confuse us and protect his network?
Alex Jones is typical of investigators in this 9/11 truth movement. Specifically, he has been exposing 9/11 and other crimes for many years. He is an experienced investigator.
This page has some audio and video excerpts of Alex Jones to help you understand that he is trying to shift the blame away from Zionists and onto other people, mainly Americans, but also some British and Chinese. Most of the people and the "truth movement" are doing exactly as he does, so try to understand this technique so that you are not fooled by it.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Alex-Jones-summary.html
My reply to someone who said Alex is a kook:
"Not a kook but a hook.
He pretends to be a host of 911 truth movement. To collect the witnesses information. And these information, likely go to the Feds office in the end.
Of course, in order to appeal the people who have real important information, what Alex Jones' report are mostly truth. A true bait to attract true bird.
For those who really have information that is fatal to this regime, you can imagine there is a disastrous end for them.
This is an evil country in the name of democracy. Be careful people."
Feds used to disguise as a booty buyer to trap thieves and robbers. They use the same tactic to collect information of 911 witnesses. So in debate they can ask: "Where is witness?". Absolute power leads to absolute corruption. No check and balance makes Feds a dangerous criminal.
549. Plant "drug shoes"? (5/27/08)
On 5/11, my relatives came to my home. They picked me up for a shopping ride. After I finished the food shopping, we went to KOHL Store. I want to buy a pair of shoes.
While I walked around to watch and test shoes, my brother suddenly urged me to go home. He said others were waiting us to go for the dinner. He said he had extra shoes to give me to save my money. So we went home. That night he gave me three pairs of shoes. The size fits my foot.
They were all used ones. Some even worn out with holes. I washed them thoroughly days later.
Then I noticed something unusual in surveillance team in my area. There are new faces to replace the old ones and they are aggressive. I wonder if they frame a new case of "drug shoes"? I thought of "shoe bomber" story. That was an authority's frame case full of flaw 6 years ago. The work was much more of a 007 story done by laboratory of intelligence because it needed special explosives and fine work than to be done by a homeless with mental problem.(see PROBLEMS SURFACE WITH SHOE BOMBER STORY http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shoedoubts.html) So will this time Feds create a case of drug shoes? Consider Feds almost exhaust all their resource to frame a case against me, it's quite possible. (only for the purpose to close the traffic of Bay Bridge, last year they plotted 1. Burning down a main Bridge exit Highway 580 by an oil tanker on 4/29/07 2. Collapsed Minneapolis Bridge to justify the close up of Bay Bridge in 8/30-9/1/07. In the name that Bridge needed a repair. 3. Tried to collapse Bay Bridge by hitting Bridge's supporter with a boat Cosco Busan. on 11/7/07.) There is no difference between planting drug shoes and planting drug money. Although it doesn't make sense to deliver drug in empty shoe heels. After all, there is no Custom to watch, why made such a dramatic operation?
I don't think my brother touches drugs. And I washed these shoes thoroughly. How can Feds make a drug shoe case? Only by planting. After I washed the shoes, my wife took out a box, asked me if I want to store them. She used to put extra shoes in garage. The garage is separated from the house and easy to access. That's an ideal place for planting. Her suggestion reminds me of the frame case. I refused. I am home all day long, surfing the internet. How can Feds intrude my house to plant drug shoe? The only chance is when I go out to shopping food on week ends. Then I did a test. Last week end, I stay at home. For consecutive three days, (last week end was memorial day long week end) my wife went out every day and ate outside. I think my speculation is correct. Because my wife used to be home on week ends, cooking food. especially these days when gas price is so high. I think Feds arranged her absence. It gave Feds a chance to intrude the house to plant if I went out shopping.
This is why I view the Fourth Amendment so important and warrantless surveillance so evil. It gives corrupt Feds chance to plant and frame innocent people.
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread