The Reptilian Resistance Forum: 587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)

[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]

587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)

Posted by Kat Hak Sung on March 2, 2009, 8:26 pm

587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)

For the false flag nuclear terror attack planed on 8/30/2007, there was a big pre-psychological propaganda. Here are some. It indicates that the heads of this country determined to nuke US citizens to justify an Iran war as early as May 2007.

Quote, "Pres. Prepares for Possible D.C. Nuke
14-May-2007
On May 10, President Bush issued a national security directive ordering all agencies to prepare for a surprise attack on the Federal government.

http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=6203

FBI's Mueller: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons
Ronald Kessler
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Osama bin Laden and his terrorist group desperately want to obtain nuclear devices and explode them in American cities, especially New York and Washington, D.C., FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III tells NewsMax.

http://www.newsmax.com/popunders/mainpop_internal.htm

Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear
Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
NewsMax Wires

Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously
http://w3.newsmax.com/a/dayofislam/?PROMO_CODE=34BE-1"

From the news, we learned that:

1. The coming false flag attack would be a nuclear attack which would cause a big loss of lives. The shock and awe would big enough to justify another war when Bush became so notorious for the Iraq war.

2. The false flag would still be Bin Laden and Al Qaida.

3. The inside group targeted at 7 US cities. New York and Washington D.C. were among them.

The 8/30/2007 incident that a B-52 flew US continental with six missiles armed with nuclear head was a soured action. Six nuclear missiles not seven as original planed is because each wing of the B-52 can only install six missiles. The missiles in other wing, un armed, were gone through a security inspection to justify it passed routine safety check.

Washington D.C. was chosen to justify it was a "real terror attack". See, now the dead are not only ordinary people. So many high ranking politicians died too. (That's sad story for those obedient followers. They are sacrifice when the Inside group think it's a necessity. ) Of course, the core member of the plot would have happened been in somewhere else. Just like Bush was in a Florida school and Cheney was in a military base on 911. The following vacuum of disappeared law makers could justify a martial law carried out by the Feds.

New York was chosen because a lot of residents in that city, especially policemen and firemen, with their own experience, knew 911 was a false flag attack. It is a good chance to wipe out a large quantity of witnesses.

8/30/2007 B-52 incident was a big case. It alarms a lot of people. The same tactic obviously can't be used again. But to activate another war, a big justification is needed. Nothing is better than a WMD. Then where can the Feds find the source of the nuclear weapon? Pakistan.

588. Extort the District Attorney (2/17/09)

In "558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)" I talked about how the Feds intimidate the Deputy D.A. Field to frame the case on me. That case goes on intensified.

Five days ago, Mercury News reported,
"Bar judge: suspend prosecutor for 4 years
By Howard Mintz
Mercury News 2/12/09

Suggesting the harshest disciplinary punishment in recent history for a California prosecutor, a state bar judge Wednesday called for Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Ben Field to be stripped of his right to practice law in the state for four years because he "abused his prosecutorial power."

That "harshest punishment" will ends Field's career as a prosecutor. Since "misleading judge, withholding evidence" are common practice in District Attorneys' office, that recommendation is extraordinary unusual. It is an extortion. The purpose is clear: if Field doesn't frame a case in time the Feds given, he'll lose his job.

Why Field is chosen? He was once a star prosecutor, worked aggressively with the ambition of becoming district attorney or a county judge. I think Field has cooperated with the Feds to frame the "fake money", "drug money" cases on me. So far the plot went soured. But my articles keep on revealing the plot of the Inside Group. The pressure from the high ranking is so heavy that we saw this harshest punishment recommendation.

Of course, it's only a push. The Deputy D.A.'s suspension is on hold while he appeals. Field is still working as a prosecutor. People can expect he'll work his best to frame a case to hold his job. I must keep alert that more malicious trap will set up by those evil minds.

The similar extortion tactic is familiar to me. They had extorted the federal attorney of North California - Ryan. Ryan finally was fired in 2007. (In famous DOJ scandal "the firing of Eight Federal Attorneys". Among the eight Federal Attorneys, Ryan was the only one who lost his job not for political reason. I allege him losing the job for failed to frame a case on me.) See story:

In "474. New Federal Attorney and March plot (3/23/07)" I wrote: Two years ago, I already found Ryan was under pressure in my case and was intimidated "do it otherwise you'll be fired." I particularly wrote a comment about it. Now I have to say my sense was very correct.

475. The fired Federal Attorney and March plot (3/28/07) and "244. Push for an aggressive case (7/29/04)

There is also the case of extortion on Attorney General.

Three months ago, On 11/20, Attorney General Michael Mukasey collapsed in a speech and was sent to the hospital. I think it was an intimidation. When Feds planed false flag terror attack in US, they would have scapegoat to take the responsibility. Those who was reluctant to approve the plan would be punished by EM wave weapon. " (577. Mumbai attack (3) (12/17/08))