The Reptilian Resistance Forum: 589. Regime change to control nuclear bomb of Pakistan (2/22/09)

[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]

589. Regime change to control nuclear bomb of Pakistan (2/22/09)

Posted by Kat Hak Sung on March 12, 2009, 11:59 pm, in reply to "587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)"

589. Regime change to control nuclear bomb of Pakistan (2/22/09)

Pakistan was Bush's ally in his eight years "war on terror". The military dictator, Musharraf, collaborated with US when he was the president of the Pakistan. Its intelligence, ISI, even helped the inside group in 911.

The head of Pakistan’s ISI, General Mahmud Ahmed, had ordered to wire $100,000 to the leader of 911 attack, Mohammed Atta through the hand of Omar Sheikh. This has been confirmed by the director of the FBI’s financial crimes unit, Dennis Lormel.

Quote, " Musharraf names 9/11 suspect as possible British asset
Fails to mention links to 9/11, ISI, CIA
By Devlin Buckley
© Copyright 2006,

http://fromthewilderness.com/members/102506_possible_names.php

Co-operation is convenient. It's easy to deny. To take the responsibility for a nuclear attack is quite different. It will be carved deep in history. Will Japanese forget Hiroshima? Musharraf's group was not that stupid. Obviously they wouldn't play that role.

When a follower became disobedient, what US would do? Replaces him with a puppet of its own. Then we saw on September 10, 2007, a deported opposition politician, Nawaz Sharif landed in Islamabad. But he was sent back to Saudi Arabia immediately. The resistance of Pakistan regime was fierce. Anyhow, the plot went on. Next month, another US asset - Benazir Bhutto - was sent to Pakistan. She was warned by a bombing to her car convoy on Oct.18 and finally was assassinated two months later when she likely would have won the president election of Pakistan. Here is a news:

Quote, "Bhutto's death a blow to US
By BobinWright and Glenn Kessler 12/28/07
Washington Post

Washington - For Benazir Bhutto, the decision to return to Pakistan was sealed during a telephone call from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice just a week before Bhutto flew home in October."

How efficient it was. A big decision made just by a phone call. Be noticed the date of their return: Sharif flew back on 9/10. (Buhtto returned one month later.) It was only ten days from 8/30/07 - the day when a B-52 flew US continent with six nuclear missiles. And that nuclear terror attack plot went soured.

The effort of a regime change was going on covertly. Mosharraf stepped down one year later.

Quote, "US backed Musharraf resigns in Pakistan
By Jane Pertez 8/19/08
New York Times

Islamabad, Pakistan - Facing imminent impeachment charges, President Pervez Musharraf announced his resignation on Monday, after months of belated recognition by US officials that he had become a waning asset in the campaign against terrorism."

You may also have noticed the resignation date. It was too just ten days after 8/8/08 - a day marked with Olympic opening ceremony in China, Russia invaded Georgia and a massive armada of US, Britain and France headed for Iran. The day I said plotted for Iran war but went soured.

The timing accordance is not a coincidence. It indicates that the attempt for Iran war is urgent. When the main project went soured, a spare one immediately activated. That a false flag nuclear attack will be used to justify the war. The nuclear bomb this time will come from Pakistan.

590. Chandra Levy case and Jon Benet case (2/27/09)

At least three times I revealed the attempt to war on Iran. Later development proved my prediction is correct. (The B-52 incident and the cases of Georgia war, massive Armada to Iran which I could not foresee happened on the predicted date.) The result was serious. After the soured attempt of 8/8/08 Iran war , the Inside Group created a financial tsunami to stabilize the dollar. Of course, the re-action on me was furious. Lehman Brothers was announced bankruptcy on 9/14. During the time from 9/15 to 12/24, I was blocked to internet for more than two months. They also shut down my ISP - AOL's homepage service and MSN community groups where I had long time posting history. (record of this thread from the #1. Now it's #590) The purpose is clear: to eliminate my revelation.

When the Feds failed in all traps they had set up for me, what they now try to do is to frame me in some case depending on DNA evidence. That was what the news reported on 12/27/08 of "New probe planned in Jon Benet's death". See "579. Jon Benet case again (12/29/08)". The news avoided to talk about what caused the new probe. I dare to say it's DNA. Now two months passed. No new story. Why? I think they are waiting for another framed case. (my case)

Five days ago, there is another similar news. Quote,
"Huge break in Chandra Levy case
By Sari Horwitz and Scott Higham Washington Post

8 years later, arrest warrant sought for federal inmate in California.

......she (Lanier ) declined to say whether it involved DNA or a piece of physical evidence. "
(Mercury News, 2/22/09)

I think Chandra Levy was murdered by the Feds. The suspect now police is going to arrest, is a sacrifice. Like Lewinsky, Chandra was an aid too. Feds used to control politicians through their aids. Six years ago, I wrote, "When Rep. Gary Condit's case happened, I had a feeling it's almost the second edition of Clinton and Lewinsky scandal. All these need intelligence operation behind curtain. Affairs revealed, politicians told a lie try to cover up the scandal, then evidence appeared to discredit them. At first, I didn't know why Condit was chosen. I got it when I saw the news said he is a member of 'intelligence committee'. A committee which oversees Federal law enforcement agency. That's the way they played once and again in peace time. Though Gary Condit was found having no relationship to Levy's death, he lost his nomination.

..... So there is nobody want to play Linda Trip any more. If they want a scandal, and Chandra Levy had self dignity and refused to be a second Paula Jones, what would be the result?

Perhaps she did not want to play a role like that, Chandra was going for another job in state prison. Her death happened before her leaving. The last chance to use her in a scandal.

The news said she checked the map of the site before she going for the jogging. She was meeting an acquaintance for an appointment. It's obvious. Only she didn't know she had to die if she insisted not to be the second Paula Jones. "

Now in two months, the Feds pushes out two famous unsolved murder case. That's not a coincidence. They are under pressure. They try to frame a case. To justify the coming frame case, they play a pre-conception psychological operation. Try to make it reasonable by two popular cases.

It's funny that they dare not to say what the new evidence is. Perhaps because I have revealed many times in advance that their tactic is to plant DNA to frame. It's interesting that they made an announcement but didn't arrest the suspect. Because they are waiting for the Santa Clara D.A.'s office to issue an arrest warrant based on DNA on me. The deputy D.A. is under pressure - do it or you'll lose your job. The dramatic effect of popular cases would run over a case not so popular, but would justify it.

I still want to repeat, DNA, just like other evidence, can be planted. They can easily collect victim's hair, sperm and plant it like a gun. Especially the victim is under 24 hours surveillance. And all rubbish are in scrutiny. Even dirty water in drainage.

If the Feds is allowed to solve the case just depend on DNA, then they can frame any people they want to.