The Reptilian Resistance Forum: 611. Restricted in US (10/17/09)

[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]

611. Restricted in US (10/17/09)

Posted by Kat Hak Sung on November 3, 2009, 6:48 pm, in reply to "587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)"

611. Restricted in US (10/17/09)

Ten days ago, I was denied to enter the Canada in board check point. Since I have all the document and sufficient fund a tourist should have. I think the board officer was instructed by the misleading information from the US Federal agent. Here is my complain to Attorney General.
“

Kat Hak Sung
Autumnvale Dr. . San Jose, Ca. 95132
Oct., 12, 2009

The honorable Attorney General Eric Holder
US Department of Justice

Dear Attorney General Holder,

I'm writing you to complain about the persecution applied on me from the Feds. The persecution includes surveillance, internet harassment, and entering misleading information in international immigration and custom system which restricted my freedom to travel.

I urge you to investigate the case.

1. I am under surveillance for more then ten years. I have been followed and tracked by the agents.

2. I am blocked to access the Internet for nearly a year. I have to go Internet by library computer.

3. On Oct. 7, 2009, I was denied to enter the Canada.
(1) It was a framed case. I have sufficient fund for travel and had plan of where to stay. But they still ordered me into inside office where I was asked with strange questions. Such like "What job do you have?", "Why you don't have a job?", "Do you play guns?" which leads to the story of persecution of the Feds. All these made me believe these officers were instructed by some misleading information from the computer.

(2) The immigration officers never tell me the reason. Until I was escorted to the departure terminal while I found the paper they gave me written with a vague reason of "to paragraph 42(1) of the immigration and refugee protection regulations". I can only guess they think I'll seek refugee in Canada.

(3) Since the officer never tell me the reason, I have no chance to argue and defense myself. In questioning, the officer knew I have sufficient fund to travel and I have a family in California and I own a house there. Maybe that was why they didn't give the proper reason. The regulation is only used as an excuse for paper work.

(4) It was a framed case not only the officers didn't tell me the reason they denied my entering of Canada, but also the officer faked my signature to make it a "voluntary withdraw".

The denial costs me time and money for an unsuccessful journey.

In conclusion, my civil right to speak and travel was seriously violated. I believe the Feds had abused its power to input misleading information in immigration and custom computer system and inform Canada authority to follow. I ask your help to investigate this case.

Sincerely

Kat Sung

612. War crisis in September (10/29/09)

From #593 to 607, I talked about how the Feds attempted to frame a drug case which was to be covered up by Iran war. The war would be justified by North Korea. In three months from April to July, N. Korea launched a ballistic missile heading to Alaska area on 4/5; did a nuclear test on 5/25; and planed to launch another ballistic missile to Hawaii area on 7/4. The 7/4 plan went soured. I think because I revealed that Iran war could have been justified by a shipment of nuclear weapon from a N. Korea's ship. That ship failed to go to its destination and finally returned to N. Korea. So that project failed.

A new attempt came in September. On 9/25, Western intelligence accused Iran of constructing a secret underground uranium enrichment facility in Qum and of hiding it from international inspectors for years. Following the revelation, media said that US would demand to access to other sites that have long been off limits and demand Iran to answer detailed questions about its suspected efforts to build nuclear weapons. A tough new sanction would be seek if Iran resisted. It means the war may start any time when Iran doesn't obey the demand.

The response from Iran was swift. Next day, Iran said it would allow U.N. inspectors to examine the newly revealed secret nuclear site. One month later, on 10/26, inspectors of IAEA examined the covert nuclear facility in Qum. Iran is very humble and cooperative this time. Iran felt the threat of war.

So said terrorists came out to help. It's not a coincidence.
The news of Secret nuclear site in Iran was released on 9/25 by western intelligence. Here are the other news:
* "Terror suspect charged in plot to make bombs. Denver man may have planned to strike there or N.Y." (By W.K.Rashbaum, New York Time, 9/25/09)
* "Bomb plot arrests in Illinois, Texas". (Chicago, AP, 9/25/09)
* On same day - 9/25 - "Osama Bin Laden demanded that European countries pull their troops out of Afghanistan in a new audiotape Friday, warning of "retaliation" against them for their alliance with the US in the war." (Caro, AP, 9/26/09)

As I always said, the war will be justified with nuclear horror, terror attack, either it is done by North Korea or Al Qaida. Though the media didn't propaganda it as a crisis, there was a war crisis in September. You can judge it how collaborated they were on Sept. 25 - Western intelligence, FBI, media and Bin Laden - when they release the news at same time.