The Reptilian Resistance Forum: 680. Lai Chang-xing and money laundering case (8/10/2011)

[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]

680. Lai Chang-xing and money laundering case (8/10/2011)

Posted by Sung on August 16, 2011, 1:27 am, in reply to "587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)"

680. Lai Chang-xing and money laundering case (8/10/2011)

Lai Chang-xing was a smuggling head - a China most wanted escapee. His case was always a big news in Chinese newspaper. Nine years ago, I found his deportation date coincided with the action date of the plot applied on me. The deportation was always cancelled at last minute(in air port) when the plot on me went soured. I realized he became a payment chip in secret deal between US and Chinese secret police. I wrote down my allegation first in "94. Interest exchange (10/19/2002)".

The same show staged again and again whenever there was a renewed plot fell on me. The most drammatical one happened in 2007. In airport before he was escorted to the plane to Beijing, in desperation, Lai hit the pillar with his head to resist the deportation. He knew what waited for him was torture and death. It was a shocking to Chinese media. So the reporters puzzled this time - how could Lai left for Beijing this time (7/22/2011) with smile on his face?

My interpretation is that Lai, from being a payment chip, becomes a co-operator of the Feds' plot. He was charged by Canadian government of money laundering. He should know as a China most wanted, he was under surveillance. How could he go on to commit crime?

On 7/10/2011, my mother told me she had given a sum of money (about $50,000) to my wife, and my wife had remitted it to her cousin in Fujian. (her countryland) The money was from by selling an apartment in Shanghai which we had lived for decades. What alarms me was two days later, my daughter told my wife she got a trophy from the Internet - 16 free tickets for a Mexico cruise. For me, this is obviously a murder arrangement. The Feds intend to eliminate all witness of the house trading and turn the money into illegal money laundering.

The handler of the house trading, my uncle, died this Februry. He was the main witness. My brother, the former paper owner of the sold apartment, was arranged in a European travel with a cruise trip in later July. He might die in "travel accident" if the main plot went through. The buyer of the house was a Wenzhonese. I allege he died in the train crash in Wenzhou on 7/23. One day after Lai Chang-xing's deportation.

My uncle's children and my aunt will come to Bay Area this month (August) to bury my uncle's ash in a cemetery. What waiting for them and other witness are that free cruise tickets. Now the 7/22 plot went soured. New plot are in planning, I believe. How many people have died in 7/22 plot? (Norway massacre and Wenzou train crash) How many people would have died if 7/22 plot had gone through? (Big disaster like earthquake, and nuclear bomb attack on New York)
I also worry the Feds may create a gaspipe explosion near that cemetery because it is not far away from San Bruno where a gaspipe explosion killed 7 people eleven months ago. Since then the media kept on talking about the danger of a gaspipe explosion. I view it as a psychological preparation for a gaspipe exploision murder.

681. Norway police is complicity of Anders Breivik (8/15/2011)

Norway police helped Breivik in his terror attack and cover up the plot.

1. Breivik was in police uniform that helped him in his terror attack.

2. Two days before the Norway terror attack, a special police unit conducted a bombing exercise in downtown Oslo which was in same area where Breivik detonated a bomb. The drill was a cover up operation to ensure the success of terror attack case. Breivik was in police uniform. He would have been misunderstood as being a policeman in anti-terror exercise if he was checked or discovered by security guards. The same tactic was used in 7/7/2005 London subway bombing. That criminal style was out of the same handler.

3. The seemingly incompetence of police assured the slaughter going on in Island. It took police one hour to reach Utoya after they received shooting report. In Virginia Tech.killing, Police blocked an information of shooting death of a student (murderer was at large) Which guaranteed the shooting spree could be carried out two hours later. Quote, "Feds Ordered VA Police To Stand Down
Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer by Federal agents.
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, April 20, 2007

4. Hide other shooter.

Witnesses said there were two shooters:

Marius Helander Roset said, gI am sure that there were shots from two different places on the island at the same timeh, he said.

The person was following them around was 180 centimeters tall (5f9), had thick dark hair and non-Nordic appearance. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back.
gI believe that there were two people who were shootingh, says Alexander Stavdal (23).

http://morrisonworldnews.com/?p=54401

Yet Police said there is only one - Breivik. He was immediately described as ga lone wolf assassinh, who gacted aloneh (BBC July 24, 2011)

In Feds planned case, there used to be back-up team to assure the success of the operation. In Virginia case, I alleged the real shooter was a Chinese man. There were at least two others as support group members: Cho Seung Hui and Emily Hilscher. (see my analysis #480 -#498) Of course, Authorities, like their countparter of Norway, said there was only one shooter.

5. Police knew he was Breivik before they arrested him.

gHe surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we donft know is how the police knew the terroristfs name before they arrested him,h said Snow

http://www.infowars.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest/

Police knew him. There was a tacit understanding between them. They called his name, he dropped the weapon immeddiately to avoid a friendly killing.

This was a terror attack co-operated (planned) by police. You can see the trace of the Feds in it.