The Reptilian Resistance Forum: 701. The most lethal sniper (1/8/2012)

[ Post a Response | The Reptilian Resistance Forum ]

701. The most lethal sniper (1/8/2012)

Posted by Sung on January 16, 2012, 9:15 pm, in reply to "587. A nuclear bombing to justify Iran war (2/10/09)"

701. The most lethal sniper (1/8/2012)

On 1/2, I went to a shopping center in Milpitas. On a pedestrian bridge over Highway 680, I encountered with a couple whom were taking picture on a boy. The Feds has moved residents away from my area long time ago. The route from my home to the shopping center is like a depopulated zone. It’s unusual to see a family there. My thought then was: the new surveillance team wanted to take a photo on me?

On 1/4, there was a news in “World Journal”. “The Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History

Posted by Bethany (Diary)

Friday, January 6th

With two hundred fifty five confirmed kills, Chris Kyle is the most deadly sniper in U.S. military history.
Chris Kyle left the service in 2009 to “save his marriage.” He has two children and lives in Dallas, Texas. Since leaving the Navy, Kyle has begun his own military contracting firm, Craft International.

http://www.redstate.com/nextgenerationvoters/2012/01/06/the-most-lethal-sniper-in-u-s-military-history/ “
You can expect what kind of deal a sniper can contract with.

It reminds me the experience in Thailand. Here is what I wrote in “126. Sniper case (crime style) (2003)

When I was in hesitation, there was an article in newspaper said that US law enforcement agent had an expert sniper newly arrived in Thailand. He would be positioned at North Thailand to shoot drug smugglers. The article introduced the sniper's glorious past, that how many people he had killed in the war.”

The news forced me to change the original plan in case the Feds to murder me in the name of killing drug smuggler. In US the shooting murder used to be under the cover of random shooting death in “bank robbery”. I encountered one, (see “402. Bank robbery in San Francisco (1) (4/25/06)” #404, 561,562.)
There was also another attempt in 2008. (see “559. Plan to murder in the name of "Bank robbery" (7/19/08)”)

I think this is the result of my recent revelation of the crime Feds committed. I also have been attacked by the censorship in Internet communication.

702. Internet censorship (1/14/2012)
The surveillance team of the Feds has various way to harass my communication in Internet.
1. The team created special formula on me which orders me to delete the links whenever I made url reference. In forum of “San Jose Mercury News” and “Contra Coast Times”, my posting effort often ended with the “instruction”:
[quote]“Your comment contains one or more links. To prevent spam, this forum no longer allows links in posts. Please press the back button, remove the links and resubmit your comment.” [/quote]

It seems to be a rule that applies to everyone. I have to follow the instruction each time to delete the url links. That creates a lot of trouble for me. Other members complained later:

[quote] “Katsung I agree with your conclusions for the most part based on your observations, but the evidence part of your thesis is lacking sorely in the presentation i.e. we need links.”
“We all find ways to post url's -- why can't you?”
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/petition-to-impeach-all-senators-who-voted-for-us-is-a-battlefield-and-to-detain-us-citizens-w [/quote]

Other people don’t have such problem. Until then I found that rule has been particularly set up for me. Since the format of the forum of Mercury News and Contra Coast Times are same, and the instruction appeared right away after I submit the post, that instruction must have been designed by the surveillance team and added to these two web sites or on the special server that monitoring on me.

2. My e-mail were intercepted or blocked. I failed to apply to be member of many web sites. My applications used to get no reply. Or sometimes after a “thank you” e-mail, there was no further “confirmation” e-mail.
[quote]“Your account is currently inactive, the administrator of the board will need to activate it before you can log in. You will receive another email when this has occured.
Thank you for registering.” [/quote]

That used to be the only email I received. I think the application email or return email either was intercepted or blocked that I could not confirm the registration. Or simply the return email was a fake one done by the surveillance team. Following webs are of no reply or no further information that I failed register.
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/index.php
https://secure.gn.apc.org/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/index.php
http://fff.fathom.org/forums/
http://community.compuserve.com
http://www.baltimoresun2.com
http://talk.myoc.com/
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/

3. Some webs banned me in rogue’s way. I think the Feds had infiltrated to the administration or forced them to do so. Here are part of them:

[quote] “You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.

Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://forums.fanhost.com/index.php”

“Your account has been banned or locked. This is a permanent ban. If the Administrator has specified a reason for this ban, you will find it below.

Paranoid lunatic. Waste of server space.

http://forums.cannabisculture.com/forums/ubbthreads.php “

“You have been banned for the following reason: Posting unwanted spam

Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.englishforum.ch/international-affairs-politics/ ”
“You have been banned for the following reason:
Not here, either.

Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.marijuana.com/index.php “
“You have been banned for the following reason:
Done with the consipiracy theories, you have done nothing to contribute to the stoner side of this site. good bye

Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.stonerforums.com/lounge/newthread.php?do=postthread&f=3 “ [/quote]

That “No reason was specified.” And “Date the ban will be lifted: Never”. reminds me of the the National Defense Authorization Act. The Feds give themselves the power to detain American citizens in jail for life without legal access. I have suffered from that principle in Internet long time ago. Watch that identical “never” sentence, how many webs have been in the hands of the Feds already?