One tactic used by the Feds is to monitor the target as close as they can. No one fits their purpose other than my wife. I am sure they recruited her for a long time.
One month ago,(11/17) returned from a cruise trip, she gave me a letter of “non-renewal of insurance” notice that demanded a repair of roof. I realized the Feds would disguise as contractor to install something on my roof. I bought newspaper on Monday to let my wife to find a contractor.(I have no phone) She hesitated for two days than said she called a company named “Modern” for estimation on Saturday. On Saturday she said the contractor wouldn’t come because it was rain. That was a bad excuse. Because of competition, contractors used to come for business within a day. It seemed the Feds didn’t like we have a free choice. So I borrowed my wife’s phone to call other roofing company by myself. It was a Korean contractor, the owner said he would come next day.
Next day (Sunday) The Korean contractor called us on the way to my house that he had to answer an emergent call so he’d come tomorrow Monday. The “Modern” would come to estimate too on Monday. Seeing their plan might be broken, my wife told me that “Modern” wanted to inspect house inside first. I didn’t agree. We replaced the roof before. The former contractor never demand to come inside to check the house. What is it for when you change the whole roof? Then my wife said she had another cheap offer from other contractor which was introduced by her flower art teacher. Now my suspicion became true. I told my wife I knew her teacher was an agent and there was no way to follow their way.
My wife met with “modern” inspector on Monday (11/24). She said the Inspector commented that the roof was nice generally, only need a repair that cost about 1500. It was contradictory to the insurance agent’s notice. The Korean company I contacted didn’t come. My wife said she called “No, thank you” to him.
One week later,(11/30) My wife said contractor would come to repair roof tomorrow. I suggest to replace whole roof instead of just repair. My wife suddenly got angry. In argument, she leaked that the coming company was “West North”. I’ve never heard of it. So what was it?
She said, “It’s the company you contacted”.
“But you didn’t meet that Korean on Monday. You said you returned him.” I said.
“I did meet him on Monday”. My wife answered. This was a lie. I saw the engineer truck came last week with company name “Modern”. She didn’t expect I watched from the window.
My wife has no word. She took out her phone and called the other side cancelled the “roof repair order”. “I don’t carry on this business any more.” She said.
A lie leads to another lie. This “West North”(it’s not that Korean’s) might be a cover company of the Feds. The whole story shows that the Feds intended to have a “contractor team” of their own to “work” on my house.
Next morning, I compromised, asked my wife to go on with “repair order”. She refused. What they want is an “inside inspection” – a warrantless search.
My wife works for the Feds. This is my house. It’s her’s too. When she doesn’t care for her own property she must have born a heavy pressure from her master.
linked message: #867, #870 to 874.
876. Mandatory roofing by climate weapon (1/10/2015)
The Feds have plotted to install something on my roof for several times. I strongly felt that and wrote “211. Create windy day (3/4)”. Would they repeat it again? In mid- December, there was a news about tornado in South California. I thought it was a cover up operation to justify a similar “tornado rips rooftop” case in my case.
Really, four days later(12/17/2014), while I was watching Chinese TV program as usual, there was an inserted emergent alarm. (KTSF 26) It warned that a tornado would take place next day in Bay Area and Santa Cruz. It was in my expectation and also proved what I thought ten years ago. The Feds harass people with their climate weapon.
The tornado didn’t happen next day. What changed their plan, I don’t know. Perhaps it’s too evident it’s a “mandatory roofing” after “insurance non-renewal”, “Neighbor’s roofing”, “Flower art teacher’s introducing”?
211. Create windy day (3/4/2004)
1. In mid 1995, I came back from China. I found there was a new tenant family in my neighborhood. At that time I was quite familiar with the tactic of Feds. So when the new neighbour complained that their roof was leaking, I thought Feds intended to inspect or install something on my roof. Anyhow, I didn't have leaking problem, so I refused the suggestion to change the roof.
In November 95, there was a windy day. The wind became strong at night. It was not roaring, it was scream. I had never experienced such a strong wind. Hearing the sound of wind, I thought, now they would complain a big leaking.
It was more than that. Next morning, I was astonished by the scene in the yard. There were tiles everywhere. This time I had to agree to change the roof tile. It looked like there was a big damage there. And rain season was coming.
Fearing Feds might install something on my roof, I watched the contractor doing their job. I found it was an easy work.
I know human can produce artificial rain for decades. But this event in 1995 enabled me for the first time to know Feds also had the technic to create a windy climate. My house (shared roof with a neighbor) was in the center of the townhouse community. There are at least 15 similar buildings with same height (2 storey) around my house, in front, back, left, right. After the event, I went around and found our building was the only one roof was damaged. They created a windy day which was the strongest I've ever met to meet their demand.
2. In July 2003, there was a second roof change demand. The tactic was the same. Neighbor tenant said it was leaking. Within a day the roofer came. The purpose was to frame a case. Because the roofer made an aggressive sale, even offered to replace the roof board, which meant they would go into the attic. (see "144. Roof contractor from Idaho (7/10)")
This time it was in a hurry. I thought it was a swift reaction to my SARS and Fujiang drug case revelation . They were scare of it. My revelation might lead to the resignation of the director of D.E.A. (see "150. Development of Fujian drug case (8/11)") They didn't create a storm in July because it was not the rain season. But they couldn't wait any longer just came to change roof in two days but failed to persuade me to do so.
3. I felt there were two attempts of new frame case on December 2003 and January 2004. Both came with rain. So in February when the newspaper said there would be a storm coming, I wrote "207. Another frame attempt". I didn't expect they would create another event of "roof change".
At the night of 2/25, there was a strong wind. The roar of wind reminded me of the night eight years ago. Such kind of roar of wind was particular and rarely heard. The sound was similar though this time it was weaker. Next morning I saw tiles everywhere in the yard and lane. I did same thing I've done last time. I went around the block where my house located. Watched roofs of other buildings in community. None was affected by the wind. The tiles were not that easy to be blown off. It seemed that wind only picked up a house(mine) in the center of the complex, and peeled off a tract of tiles, left a large, eye-catching shadow on the roof.
I did the repair myself with the help of my relatives.
I think the damage was done by men not wind. Despite other allegations, the two events all took place at midnight. However strong the wind was, it never blew off a single tile during the daytime. It damaged bigger at night. This may also be one of the advantages to empty the community. It ensured perpetrators that nobody would witness their crime when they tore down the tile.
« Back to index