[ Post a Response | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]
Posted by Nellie
on May 10, 2012, 9:52 pm, in reply to "Re: QD special request"
202.161.26.2
You must have an extraordianary head !!
I used to rely a lot on memory but it gets too much - and it is too easy to include the "speculations" that arise without realising.
I too am planning a record of the jewels as I encounter them in "the book", and with source noted. It can then be expanded as more info turns up.
As far as I am concnered, the book will mark an important point in time. I might use bQD and aQD !!
--Previous Message--
: You're welcome. I am conscious of placing that
: prefix in front of everything related to the
: QD, I wouldn't want to ruin your fun of
: reading all the new information first hand.
:
: I look forward to your contributions and
: opinions, when your copy finally arrives.
:
: Reading over this book, and the others has
: prompted me to start an inventory of
: detailed and referenced notes of every
: notably piece mentioned in all the
: publications. For my future reference (at
: the moment, ALL the information I know is
: just stored in my head).
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: Thanks Boffer for your QD alert higher for
: "Something interesting". It
: worked !!
: That now makes two threads untouched by me.
: Fingers crossed but my copy of the book
: could arrive late next week
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: As I posted below at
:
:
: http://members2.boardhost.com/royal-jewels/msg/1336491821.html
:
: perhaps posters with messages that disclose
: info from the new book The Queen's Diamonds
: might prefix their Subject each time with
: QD.
:
: I do prefer to enjoy the book to the fullest
: when I receive my copy.
:
: I do not suggest anyone needs to delay
: posting messages but I prefer to be allerted
: and have the choice to read or wait.
:
: Nellie
133
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »