Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington Archived Message
Posted by Dawn on June 29, 2012, 5:09 pm, in reply to "Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington"
I know the details of the Kennedys' lives, including that of Kathleen. I know she was married for a brief time but she was the marchioness of Hartington from 1944 to 1948, so maybe she may have worn a tiara belonging to her husband's family during that time period. Actually, the question I asked was aimed for the British posters, hoping some of them may have seen either pictures or comments that Kathleen did wear something. You are as American as I am, Jinja, but maybe the British posters had seen something in their newspapers or magazines. Hence for my question in my previous post. Maybe I should have made clear as to whom I was asking that question. --Previous Message-- : Kathleen was married for only a few weeks; her : husband was killed in the war not long after : their wedding. Her wedding dress was a : daytime suit. I doubt she ever wore a : tiara, though she was close to her late : husband's family until her own death a few : years later. She is buried in the : Devonshire family cemetery, and President : Kennedy visited her grave when he was in : England. : :
|
Message Thread:
- Rose Kennedy and Tiaras - Dawn June 28, 2012, 2:09 am
- Re: Rose Kennedy and Tiaras - Mia June 28, 2012, 4:18 am
- Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington - Dawn June 28, 2012, 6:21 pm
- Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington - jinja June 28, 2012, 8:55 pm
- Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington - Dawn June 29, 2012, 5:09 pm
- Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington - Maridje June 29, 2012, 8:51 am
- Re: Kathleen, Marchioness of Hartington - SarahN June 29, 2012, 7:33 pm
|
|