Posted by Boris on May 7, 2013, 6:15 am, in reply to "Re: Boris"
The ability to receive constructive criticism as well as the choice to restrict personal discussions to the PM level are much cherished qualities in the world of Internet MBs, Joye. As this discussion obviously doesn't lead to any willingness on your part to understand what the constructive criticism of your posts by me and others is about, let's not waste more space here. Life Is Change. All the very best to you.
--Previous Message-- : : : 2 points. : : 1. a poster should not be telling another : what to do. : 2. You do not have to click on the post. : : . --Previous Message-- : Thank you very much, John R. : Joye, I find the hostility of your post most : regrettable and ultimately inacceptable. I : was never anything less than polite in my : criticism. : You also appear to have forgotten that I - : as well as others - once even tried my best : to help you in detail with your picture : posting problems. : I find your attitude disappointing and the : fact that you choose to deal with : constructive criticism in such an adverse : manner rather sad. : : : --Previous Message-- : Why the hostility? We appreciate your : efforts : to post. We are simply asking you - for some : time now - to provide all other visitors of : this board a little more information in the : subject header. Surely that is not a very : unreasonable request? Even 'QEII Brooch' or : something would do. Than we can have the : choice or at least make an educated guess : : : --Previous Message-- : Boris, : You have been attacking and criticising my : posts for a very very long time, and I have : never before responded. Also noted that I am : your only target. : So Boris, get off my back. : If you do not like the way I word or head my : posts, there is a simply solution, do not : click on it. : : --Previous Message-- : Here's a link to an article about the issue : and a picture of the portrait. : It's obviously difficult to discuss it : without seeing it (or without knowing from : the subject header what this topic is : about... ). : As the artist's style is not photo realism, : maybe the brooch doesn’t necessarily exist : in this form in reality? : Article: : : : : : : http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/artist-dan-llywelyn-hall-defends-his-spitting-image-portrait-of-the-queen-against-critics-8602889.html : : : : : --Previous Message-- : A new portrait of QEII by Dan Llywelyn in : Cardiff, has caused some criticism. : : The Queen wears a brooch I do not recognise. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
on May 7, 2013, 6:15 am, in reply to "