[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: Information from Louvre Archived Message

    Posted by Pierre on September 1, 2015, 2:47 am, in reply to "Re: Information from Louvre"

    Again Arthur, thanks so much for the wonderful pictures and explanations.

    I was at the Louvre about a month and a half ago, in the Appolon Gallerie, and I could see the Sapphire and diamond parure in the flesh, after about 15 or 20 years. The tiara is so tiny and delicate! A lot of the elements of the tiara are crooked and I believe that if it was to be worn again, the frame would have to be redone or the whole tiara re-mounted.

    Actually, the whole parure looks much smaller in person that what I thought when seeing it on picture - my memory from 20 years ago had vanished I suppose -, but then I had to remember that Madame was a small women, and that if I think about her neck, then the size of the jewels I saw make sense.

    In any case, I spent about an hour looking at the displays in the Appolon Gallerie, and could not have enough!!

    --Previous Message--
    : I think that the Louvre's information is
    : partly erroneous, and that they are
    : confusing the tiaras of the two parures.
    :
    : Marie-Amélie's portrait by Hersent is the
    : one posted by Baxter. Judging from the
    : Queen's age, and also the crown on the
    : throne's back, without the fleurs-de-lys,
    : the painting probably dates back to the
    : 1830s. But certainly not 1863.
    : As it was customary for royal portraits,
    : there are several replicas of this portrait.
    : For instance, the first picture is now in
    : Chantilly, while the second picture is in
    : Versailles:
    :
    :
    :
    :
    : When he wrote his book about the French
    : Crown Jewels ( Les Joyaux de la Couronne de
    : France , 1988), Bernard Morel could get an
    : exceptional access to the Orleans House
    : Archives, including an inventory of Queen
    : Marie-Amelie's jewels made in 1839. The
    : sapphire and diamond parure described in
    : this inventory included:
    : 1) a big diadem, "articulated"
    : with nine main elements (I think it means
    : nine detachable elements)
    : 2) a necklace of eight large sapphires
    : surrounded by diamonds, with diamond chain
    : drops inbetween
    : 3) a pair of earrings with sapphire and
    : diamond buttons and sapphire briolette drops
    : 4) a small "Sévigné" brooch made
    : of three sapphires, among them a
    : "square-oval"-shaped one,
    : surrounded with diamonds.
    : These four elements had been bought i the
    : late 1810s/early 1820s by Marie-Amelie's
    : husband, King Louis-Philippe (then Duke of
    : Orleans), from Queen Hortense, the then
    : exiled daughter of the late Empress
    : Josephine. The 1839 inventory mentioned
    : three more elements, which were later
    : additions to the sapphire parure:
    : 5) a bracelet made of a large clear
    : sapphire surrounded with brilliants, and six
    : rows of a total of 198 fine pearls
    : 6) another bracelet made of a very
    : beautiful sapphire surrounded with
    : brilliants with ornamented diamond chain
    : 7) a "comb-crown" ("
    : peigne-couronne ") of 15 sapphires, 66
    : pearls and diamonds.
    :
    : On the portrait of Queen Marie-Amelie by
    : Hersent, as posted by Baxter and above, we
    : can clearly identify the sapphire, pearl and
    : diamond "comb-crown" (#7), the
    : necklace (#2), the earrings (#3) and the
    : small "Sévigné" brooch (#4).
    : The tiara described in #1 is very probably
    : worn on this portrait as the eight brooches
    : pinned on the dress and the lowest of the
    : corsage brooches.
    :
    : Now, what were the whereabouts of this
    : parure after 1839?
    :
    : Five of the nine elements of the tiara (#1)
    : were mounted as tiara, the form under which
    : it was worn by the wives of all the Heads of
    : the French Royal Family until 1985. With the
    : necklace (#2) and the earrings (#3), they
    : are now in the Louvre Museum.
    :
    : One of the four remaining elements of the
    : original tiara (#1) was slightly
    : transformed, mainly with the addition of an
    : extra pear-shaped sapphire drop at the
    : bottom, to create a larger corsage brooch,
    : which is now also in the Louvre Museum.
    :
    :
    :
    : The three remaining elements of the original
    : tiara (#1) were also slightly transformed
    : (by jeweller Bapst in 1846, according to
    : Bernard Morel), with additional pearl and
    : diamond motifs, to create three large
    : corsage brooches, which along the
    : "comb-coronet" (#7) and another
    : pair of sapphire, pearl and diamond
    : earrings, formed the second parure,
    : auctioned off by the Count of Paris in 1996.
    : The scroll-motifs of these three brooches
    : are indeed strikingly similar to the ones of
    : the elements of the tiara of the Louvre's
    : parure.
    :
    :
    :
    : The whereabouts of the following jewels are
    : still unclear: the small "Sévigné"
    : brooch (#4) and the two bracelets (#5 and
    : #6). Maybe they were dismantled to create
    : the earrings of the second parure, or the
    : sapphire, diamond and pearl buttons at the
    : top of two of the three corsage brooches of
    : the second parure?
    :
    : On the other hand, the origin of the two
    : small brooches of the Louvre's parure is
    : unclear. The one with a rectangular shape
    : could possibly be the
    : "square-oval" sapphire described
    : in the small "Sévigné" brooch
    : (#4). Of the second parure, the origin of
    : the large octogonal brooch, as well of the
    : earrings, is unclear too.
    :
    :
    :


    Message Thread: