[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: Queen Mary - small tiara Archived Message

    Posted by Beth on October 18, 2016, 4:02 pm, in reply to "Re: Queen Mary - small tiara"

    Fascinating! Thank you Arthur.

    I find your deductions very convincing. What a great eye and memory you have.

    After I saw the photos Nellie posted in 2013 I too saw a rose shape in the central element.

    I wonder which of her rose of York brooches might have been used? The one given to her by the King or the one from the West Yorkshire regiment?

    Below is a sketch of the rose of York brooch given as a wedding gift by the West Yorkshire regiment in 1893. Unfortunately, I don't have a photo (where I am certain of the provenance) of the brooch given to her by George V.



    Queen Mary's use of various jewels in novel ways never ceases to intrigue me.

    --Previous Message--
    : I am quite sure this brooch is not the same as
    : the Countess of Wessex's wedding tiara (even
    : considering it could be mounted in a
    : different setting than today).
    :
    : My impression is that the "tiara"
    : worn in Melbourne in 1901 by Queen Mary
    : (then Duchess of Cornwall and of York) is
    : not a "real" tiara, but a head
    : ornament made from various elements
    : assembled together:
    :
    : - the two lateral "snail-like"
    : scrolling elements look strikingly similar
    : on this picture of Queen Mary in Melbourne
    : to the ones visible on this other picture of
    : Queen Mary - with a different central
    : element:
    :
    :
    :
    :
    : - the central element on the picture of
    : Queen Mary in Melbourne is probably one one
    : the diamond brooches in the shape of an
    : heraldic Yorkshire rose that Queen Mary
    : received as wedding gifts - see
    : http://members2.boardhost.com/royal-jewels/msg/archive/1413549745.html
    : Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, occasionally
    : wore one of these brooches:
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :


    Message Thread: