we have to talk . . .

Posted by geo on September 22, 2009, 9:02 am, in reply to "Say goodbye to CFRB as you know it ..."
70.26.133.86

. . . interesting that a thread about places mike marshall goes for lunch draws more comment than does news of a major shakeup @ RB . . . geo

---

Responses: We have to talk . . . - Larry LeBlanc September 22, 2009, 9:18 am Re: We have to talk . . . - Radio Wiz September 22, 2009, 3:27 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - Willy Lump Lump September 22, 2009, 9:45 am Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 10:35 am Re: We have to talk . . . - RadioActive September 22, 2009, 11:49 am Re: We have to talk . . . - Peter the K September 22, 2009, 12:16 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 1:01 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - BarryG September 22, 2009, 1:40 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - Peter the K September 22, 2009, 3:22 pm Icon - Dial Twister September 22, 2009, 12:40 pm Re: Icon - Machine September 22, 2009, 12:51 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - greg simpson September 22, 2009, 10:31 am Re: We have to talk . . . - shane alexander September 22, 2009, 2:12 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - BarryG September 22, 2009, 2:20 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 4:47 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - Grandknight September 22, 2009, 4:56 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - shane alexander September 22, 2009, 6:00 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 9:28 pm « Back to thread

---

Post a response(you need a username and password E-mail moderator )