Posted by Willy Lump Lump on September 22, 2009, 9:45 am, in reply to "We have to talk . . . "99.227.37.98 Especially since there is now very little news. Talk 1010 would make more sense. Responses: Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 10:35 am Re: We have to talk . . . - RadioActive September 22, 2009, 11:49 am Re: We have to talk . . . - Peter the K September 22, 2009, 12:16 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 1:01 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - BarryG September 22, 2009, 1:40 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - Peter the K September 22, 2009, 3:22 pm Icon - Dial Twister September 22, 2009, 12:40 pm Re: Icon - Machine September 22, 2009, 12:51 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - greg simpson September 22, 2009, 10:31 am Re: We have to talk . . . - shane alexander September 22, 2009, 2:12 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - BarryG September 22, 2009, 2:20 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 4:47 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - Grandknight September 22, 2009, 4:56 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - shane alexander September 22, 2009, 6:00 pm Re: We have to talk . . . - nevermind September 22, 2009, 9:28 pm « Back to thread
Post a response(you need a username and password E-mail moderator ) WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your name: Your e-mail address: Subject: Message: Link to an image here: Enter title of linked site here:Link to another site here: By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Your name:
Your e-mail address:
Subject: