Posted by ig NB: They ran 18+ and not 12+ on the graph. Ig. It should be noted, and I haven't seen it so far, that this 'new' system is just as flawed, if not more-so than the old system. But like the old system, this is the new measuring stick whether we like it or not.
on September 22, 2009, 11:36 am, in reply to "Re: Say goodbye to CFRB as you know it ..."
99.226.90.65 | Message modified by user radioguy September 22, 2009, 2:57 pm
Here's the best that is publicly availabe.
http://www.rmb.ca/ppm.aspx?id=20878
Click on Toronto and it'll download a PDF file.
The stations are listed, but not identified. For the biggies and bottoms in the last book it's not a huge guessing game to figure out who's who.
Based on their own graph, which appears to sort the stations based on the new PPM data, the 18+ leader in spring, is now in 5th place in the market.
S2'09 PPM
01 03
02 02
03 05
04 07
05 01
06 04
07 09
08 06
09 12
10 10
11 11
12 13
13 14
14 08
15 16
16 15
17 18
18 17
Responses: