So my best guess is that HM left most of her jewels to King Charles III with maybe a provision that certain pieces should be life loans to particular members of the Royal Family.
That would mean each lady would have her own pieces to wear, but they would not be able to sell it as it still belongs to the Sovereign.
It might, but we’d never really know for sure right? Because they probably wouldn’t release that information to the public. I think it would be great if Bea and Eug got tiaras from granny, but HM was. sensible woman who knows that the two Yorks wouldn’t have anywhere to wear them to.
JohnPete,
Do you think the tiaras worn at the Coronation will reflect the what the Queen gave people in her will? If Princess Eugenie wears the Greville Emerald tiara, do you think it might be because it is now hers?
I wonder if Sarah, Duchess of York would be invited or not. I don’t think Charles is fond of her, and I don’t think there’s a precedent for a divorced former family member to attend. But no doubt if she did attend, she’d wear her wedding tiara again after a long time. If she doesn’t get invited, she could lend the tiara to Beatrice or Eugenie.
I wonder if Meghan attends the coronation, will she wear a tiara and given the house order of King Charles III?
1421
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »