Another way of looking at it is that it's a tribute to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II--a reminder of her. Monarchy is supposed to be about continuity, after all. Too, this tiara was of course first associated with a Queen Consort, Queen Mary. I would not be surprised if QEII made known a wish that Camilla would wear these pieces. It's not good for the institution if the King's consort is de-legitimized; and how long is a 75-year-old woman supposed to wait to wear the symbols of her position and role? An official year of mourning has passed.
I too was shocked when I saw it. Now I have said it.
Our memories of the beloved Queen Elizabeth II are still very strong.
That tiara is the item of jewellery most closely associated with her, in life, in portraits, on stamps and on coins still in circulation.
The speed with which iconic symbols of the reign of a queen regnant are being dismissed is distressing.
Not even her crimson robe worn at her coronation and followed by countless state openings of parliament has been spared.
So much for recognition of the longest reign in British history , man or woman.
😂😂😂
I’m shocked I thought this piece would have gone in semi retirement for now as It was so closely associated with the Late Queen I thought next time I’d see it would be on Catherine
607
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »