[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: QV's Regal Circlet revisited Archived Message

    Posted by JohnPete on September 3, 2012, 9:52 am, in reply to "Re: QV's Regal Circlet revisited"

    I guess the base and Maltese crosses went to Maud, and the elements were left behind with the thought that they could either be broken down for diamonds, else worn as a necklace or mounted on a framework for a (in my opinion, unfortunate) tiara.

    As for this photo, Princess Edward's coiffure is the primary culprit here. Her hairdresser could have do much to improve the situation by building a larger nest for the tiara to rest on. Even a small hairpiece could have helped conceal the framework. Clearly the framework was designed for voluminous 'tiara hair' so I wonder why the elements haven't been placed on a smaller frame to better suit HRH.

    --Previous Message--
    :
    : Here are some details of the alternate
    : elements for reference purposes
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :
    : --Previous Message--
    :
    : Brock - that is wonderful. But it does seem
    : to be an illustrator's idea of it.
    :
    : The base does not match the Regal Circlet.
    : The three minor elements seem right enough.
    : But the central front one does not seem to
    : match the element intended to hold the
    : Koh-i-noor.
    :
    : Thanks for posting your find.
    :
    :
    :
    : --Previous Message--
    : I just came across this photo of a Queen
    : Victoria engraving online which vauguely
    : seems to illustrate an alternate arrangement
    : featuring the honeysuckle pieces:
    :
    :
    :
    : SOURCE:
    :
    :
    : http://www.gogmsite.net/early_victorian_-_1837_-_18/queen_victoria/queen-victoria-carte-de-vis.html
    :
    : The illustration appears based on this
    : portrait.
    :
    :
    :
    : Thoughts?
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :


    Message Thread: