I don't recognize the style of writing. What I do see is the typical 'I was there when it happened', even when it was 100 years ago, combined with the 'everyone else has it wrong but not me' attitude that some jewellery writers love to use.
By the way, De Ferand falsely states the peacock parure was not a gift to Irene. Els Smit has discovered a first hand account by the Spanish ambassador to the Netherlands who was present when Wilhelmina gave the jewels to Irene.
--Previous Message-- : I have been wondering too. He/she has written : many articles about the Dutch royal jewels : and suggests to have intimate knowledge, for : instance about how the jewels are kept and : have been registered. But from time to time : his/her information turns out to be : incorrect, like for instance about the large : sapphire parure of which he/she stated that : is was created by Mellerio. : I also think that the name is a "nom de : plume". : : : --Previous Message-- : Just a question; I'm sure it's a pseudonym. : : :