But now, with the move towards predominantly digital media and streaming by definition the written word associated with that recording is marginalised. Where I have bought downloads I must admit I rarely read the accompanying digital booklets because I don't want to sit in front of a computer screen while listening to the music. So I imagine that for some companies creating an intelligent booklet is almost perceived as a waste of time preferring instead a gushing artist biog and some moody pics - DG with their A list artists are particularly prone to this. Perhaps labels such as SOMM who are more repertoire than artist facing still believe in the importance of a well-written liner....? Previous Message
Mike, like you I fall into the bracket of being "of a certain age" and my eyesight is not what it once was.
I completely agree with your comments. I firmly believe that the documentation is a key element in any release, considered as a package, and that's why I invariably comment on the quality of the booklet in my own reviews, including comment as to the legibility - or otherwise - of what is provided.
You're right to say that quality varies. I agree about Naxos and Chandos. My experience is that very often it's the smaller independent labels that set the standard - SOMM and Albion are among the best. The so-called 'majors' are usually sub-standard.
Message Thread Sleeve notes - Mike Hardy July 20, 2024, 10:44 am
« Back to index | View thread »
Thank you for taking part in the MusicWeb International Forum.
Len Mullenger - Founder of MusicWeb