[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: Imperial emeralds Archived Message

    Posted by Boris on October 14, 2012, 3:39 am, in reply to "Imperial emeralds "

    It's most unfortunate that the ‚Imperial emeralds’ don’t exist in this form anymore.
    Preserving the original diamonds in their setting but removing the emeralds to create other pieces was a particularly strange move by Van Cleef & Arpels considering such a historic piece.
    Particularly around the bottom, the design of the tiara (actually a full circlet) simply does not work without the lustre of translucent stones, IMHO.
    This is how it looks today:




    --Previous Message--
    : Wedding present from Napoleon to his second
    : wife, empress Marie-Louise. The empress left
    : the parure to archduchess Elisabeth.
    : It was sold in 1953 by her descendants to
    : Van Cleef and Arpels who removed
    : dramatically the emeralds from the tiara to
    : create new jewels and replaced them by
    : turquoises.
    : The tiara was bought later by Marjorie
    : Merryweather Post for the Smithsonian
    : Institution of Washington where it's now on
    : display.
    : The necklace and earrings have been acquired
    : by the Louvre, no idea of the whereabouts of
    : the belt buckle
    :
    :
    : Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    :


    Message Thread: