[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: Imperial emeralds Archived Message

    Posted by Nellie on October 14, 2012, 4:48 am, in reply to "Re: Imperial emeralds "


    I don't usually comment in this way but that looks ugly.


    --Previous Message--
    : It's most unfortunate that the ‚Imperial
    : emeralds’ don’t exist in this form anymore.
    : Preserving the original diamonds in their
    : setting but removing the emeralds to create
    : other pieces was a particularly strange move
    : by Van Cleef & Arpels considering such a
    : historic piece.
    : Particularly around the bottom, the design
    : of the tiara (actually a full circlet)
    : simply does not work without the lustre of
    : translucent stones, IMHO.
    : This is how it looks today:
    :
    :
    :
    :
    : --Previous Message--
    : Wedding present from Napoleon to his second
    : wife, empress Marie-Louise. The empress left
    : the parure to archduchess Elisabeth.
    : It was sold in 1953 by her descendants to
    : Van Cleef and Arpels who removed
    : dramatically the emeralds from the tiara to
    : create new jewels and replaced them by
    : turquoises.
    : The tiara was bought later by Marjorie
    : Merryweather Post for the Smithsonian
    : Institution of Washington where it's now on
    : display.
    : The necklace and earrings have been acquired
    : by the Louvre, no idea of the whereabouts of
    : the belt buckle
    :
    :
    : Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    :
    :
    :


    Message Thread: