[ Message Archive | Royal Jewels of the World Message Board ]

    Re: Field Archived Message

    Posted by Nellie on February 4, 2014, 11:14 pm, in reply to "Re: Fields says QEII did proofreading"


    Yes Joye, I did think it could be the Womens Weekly. There is a local source to find that. I'll probably send you a PM.

    But did Field actually identify the Queen publicly, in any publication?
    I would have thought Field would have been very careful about identifying any person who cooperated with her.

    And the word "proofreading" encompasses a lot lot more than providing "Yes" and "No".
    So that was why I was concerned over the heading.

    We all know how easily the wrong idea can acquire a life of its own and whizz around the net !!


    --Previous Message--
    : Sorry I have no date or anything for this
    : article. Long before I knew how important to
    : have records. W might be Womens Weekly?
    : Try looking under yank leslie field google
    : also google leslie field traces rich
    : history of queens jewels
    :
    : I also made a note from royal forums from
    : one of the qeii jewels brooches earrings
    : tiaras , but not the post no or the jewel
    : but it said in a foreword by fields she says
    : the queen would leave pencilled no or yes in
    : the margin proofreading by the queen.
    :
    : --Previous Message--
    : Elsewhere again I read that Leslie Field
    : said
    : that The Queen would pencil yes or no in the
    : margin of text submitted , in the forward of
    : her book The Queen's Jewels.
    : I have been unable to find this in the Field
    : book.
    : Help please!
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :
    :

    Message Thread: