One interesting difference of opinion. I also love the warmer recordings of Mahler’s 1st and I credit Duggan for introducing me to such conductors as Barbirolli. But, I’m also very interested in historical recordings in general and I love to hear things like the Rosbaud release. I found that l really enjoyed the cold, clear, one-dimensional reading of his 1st. In trying to figure out why, I keep thinking about Tony’s idea that sometimes the “wrong” interpretation held all the way through, and in the “right” hands, can work.
If a critic gets bored and wants a new project, I would be interested in a summary guide for the curious looking to branch out more and make more connections.
For instance, if you like Bernstein, listen to his students Tilson Thomas and Alsop. Contrast him with Boulez.
If you like Barbirolli, listen to his Bruckner and Elgar too.
Maazel isn’t so identified with Mahler, but he is identified with (who)?
[
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »
Thank you for taking part in the MusicWeb International Forum.
Len Mullenger - Founder of MusicWeb