Thanks, Mike - I did not take it as such; just clarifying my position! I try to listen to the best versions available, state my preference - and that's it; I certainly have no axe to grind and have so far welcomed virtually all HDTT and Pristine issues as improvements over what has been previously been issued. For example, Art et Son have done good work with the Callas recordings but I still think what Andrew Rose does usually enhances them further for our listening purposes - and on the rare occasion when - in my opinion - he does not, I am happy to say so.
Previous Message
Hi Ralph
This was in no way a criticism of your excellent surveys. Just a comment that some people are more interested in technical "improvements" than the music!
As Beecham once said “The English may not like music, but they absolutely love the noise it makes.” Previous Message
Mike, my sole aim in doing surveys is to suggest which recordings offer the most enjoyable experience. Previous Message
Does anyone here just want to enjoy the music? Previous Message
Previous Message
Agree 100%, especially when attempting to create artificial stereo from mono recordings.
IMHO, the Brahms first example above, like most of Paul Howard's (RA's) work, is more an example of removing patina than artificial enhancement.
Along those lines, I also personally favor the Pristine Mark Obert Thorne restorations, because similar to the RA restorations, they attempt to preserve the unique sonic characteristics of the original recording venues.
Just my two cents! :)
Thank you for taking part in the MusicWeb International Forum.
Len Mullenger - Founder of MusicWeb