Re: Both, actually Archived Message
Posted by ErikS on October 21, 2015, 4:12 pm, in reply to "Re: Both, actually"
Good question. I guess it was because the tiara was intended to express the dignity of the office she was holding, and not of the person, of the wife of the person who holds the office. Of course buying a tiara with tax payers money is already a bit outrageous nowadays.
|
|