Posted by Laurence on February 23, 2012, 3:21 am, in reply to "Re: possibility"
Ok now I am really loosing it. I just looked again at the pictures that everyone posted and NO ONE has posted the fake one. I am sorry for the confusion.
Laurence
--Previous Message-- : I am quite sure Laurence that the news paper : picture I posted is genuin. It was published : in April 1929 in a wedding special (Olav and : Märtha). The montage you refer to is from a : picture taken in June. : : --Previous Message-- : Yes this is the real one, the fake one is : the : one in the oval frame that is part of a : newspaper article. I referred to the wrong : picture. : : Laurence : : : : --Previous Message-- : : Oh my! Is everyone else getting confused : too? : So Monica, this pic of Queen Maud is : genuine? : : : : --Previous Message-- : No, the picture Nellie (and I) showed of : queen : Maud with the maltese tiara are genuin. The : were first published i March 1929 and that : was the first time Maud was seen publicly in : this jewel. The photographer is Sjøwall. : : : : http://www.digitaltmuseum.no/things/kongefamilien/NF/NF.09771-004 : What Laurence is refering to is a picture : taken a few monts later (for 25 jubilee) : : : : : : :