Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin Archived Message
Posted by Sal on October 22, 2013, 6:39 am, in reply to "Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin"
What I don't understand: the Van Kempen company altered/restored the tiara in 1928. Therefore they used the original design. Did they get the design from the royal archives? If yes: shouldn't they have returned it in 1928? Or now? --Previous Message-- : Dear fellow posters, : : I made a summary of the documentation in : Rene Brus' book regarding the Dutch sapphire : tiara on my website. Check : http://www.erikschoonhoven.nl/royal-jewels/why-the-dutch-sapphire-tiara-is-not-mellerio-nor-massin/ : : Best, : Erik :
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - ErikS October 20, 2013, 9:08 am
- Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - Jos October 20, 2013, 11:59 am
- Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - Tamara October 20, 2013, 5:05 pm
- Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - Nellie October 20, 2013, 6:56 pm
- Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - John R October 20, 2013, 10:43 pm
- Reply/Vever - ErikS October 21, 2013, 3:48 am
- Re: Massin - Nellie October 21, 2013, 6:39 pm
- Re: Why the Dutch sapphire tiara is not Mellerio, nor Massin - Sal October 22, 2013, 6:39 am
|
|